Show Me The Bids
A two-sided roofing marketplace for Virginia, built end to end in six weeks under fractional advisory. Two roles, three dashboards, 17 transactional emails, 443 automated tests.
- concept to live
- 6 weeks
- tests shipped
- 443
A monthly relationship that turns "we should be using AI" into systems that ship. We diagnose your business the way a COO would, then build the systems the way an engineer would, because the same person has done both jobs.
01 / What's at stake
You keep saying "we should do something with AI." Three months later you've said it again. Your ops person sent you a Loom of a Zapier flow they built on a weekend. It works. Nothing else does. The team is curious. The leadership wants results. Nobody owns the work.
The instinct is to hire. A full-time AI lead costs $120K–$180K loaded, takes four months to find, and ninety days to onboard. By the time they're shipping, almost a year is gone. Worse: half of these hires never produce a working system, because the people who can write the strategy rarely write the code, and the people who write the code rarely ask whether the strategy was right.
A fractional CAIO inverts that math. Two weeks to start. Monthly cost in the low five figures or less. The same person owns the diagnosis and the build, because that's how you keep them honest. If the work doesn't ship, there's no one else to blame.
Strategy people don't ship code. Code people don't question the strategy. You need someone who has done both jobs, or you get neither one done right.
02 / What the engagement covers
When something breaks at 4pm on a Tuesday, you need someone to pick up. That's most of this job. The other parts: strategy, tooling decisions, your team's training, the governance work nobody wants to do.
01 · Strategy
We start with a full operational map of where time leaks across your team, function by function, week by week. From that map we build a priority-ranked roadmap of AI opportunities, scored on ROI and feasibility. The roadmap is yours to keep, signed off by you, and the work plan for the next quarter. No deck-only deliverables.
02 · Vendor evaluation
During the strategy sprint we audit the AI and automation tools your team is already paying for, score them against what your operation actually needs, and recommend what to keep, drop, or swap. As new categories come up across the engagement, we evaluate the realistic options for SMB scale and give you a written recommendation, not a vendor pep talk. We don't sit through monthly vendor pitches on your behalf. We do read the docs, run the trials, and tell you which features matter for your work and which ones are slideware.
03 · Team enablement
Every engagement names an internal counterpart on your side. We train them on every system we build, document the runbook, and stay on as the backstop. By month six they can run the playbook without us. That's the design. If you outgrow us, you take the playbook with you and we shake hands.
04 · Governance
Data handling, prompt logging, model selection, access control, audit trail. Nothing exotic. The framework that lets your finance lead, your legal counsel, and your largest customer all answer "yes, they have a policy" without any of you sweating. We write the first version and revise it as the systems ship.
05 · Advisory
A standing weekly or bi-weekly call covers what shipped, what's stuck, and what's next. Between calls we're in your Slack or email for the questions that don't need a meeting. When something breaks, we don't wait for the next sprint review. This is the part full-time hires rarely get right, because they're heads-down on one project. We're heads-up by design.
03 / How we work
01 · Scoping
We talk through your current operation, where you'd want a CAIO to start, and which tier fits. This is not a sales call dressed as discovery. If the answer is "you don't need us yet," we say so and route you to the free Assessment instead. If the fit is right, you get a written proposal within 48 hours.
Free · 30 minutes02 · Strategy sprint
We sit with your team and watch the work. Time-tracking by function. Process mapping. Tool inventory. Bottleneck identification. At the end of week three you get the operational map, the opportunity list, and the 90-day plan. You approve the priority before any code gets written.
Weeks 1–303 · Build
We ship the highest-ROI build first. Usually lead intake, reporting, or content production, because those pay back fastest. The second build follows on a one-month lag. Every system comes with a documented runbook, error notifications wired to your Slack, and a 30-day backstop in case it breaks.
Months 2–304 · Advisory
Months four through six is when the compound starts. With the first two systems running, we build the next three on a monthly cadence. Your internal owner is shadowing every build by month four and running the smaller ones by month six. The advisory cadence holds steady. So does the standing call. By months six through twelve the second cohort of systems ships, and your internal owner stops asking "what should we build next" and starts proposing it. That compound is the reason CAIO exists. A 90-day engagement cannot produce it.
Months 4–605 · Quarterly review
At the end of every quarter we run a written review. Hours reclaimed, systems shipped, ROI against fee, what's working, what isn't, what the next 90 days should look like. If the answer is "you don't need us anymore," we say so and structure the handoff. Most engagements run 12–18 months. None run because we hid the off-ramp.
Every 90 days04 / Proof
05 / How to engage
Fixed-duration engagement built around one strategic question or one build. You get the operational diagnosis, the recommendation, and our hands on the build that comes out of it. We're in your Slack for the duration and out at the end with a documented handoff.
Who it’s for · You have one clear strategic question or one specific system to build, and you want senior advisory plus delivery without committing to a long retainer. Common entry point for first-time CAIO buyers.
Monthly retainer, embedded in your leadership rhythm. We attend your leadership meetings when AI strategy comes up. We own the roadmap and ship the systems against it. Your internal AI owner reports to your operation but works with us every week. Three-month minimum, and most engagements run longer because the value compounds across builds.
Who it’s for · You know AI matters to your operation for the next three years and you'd rather rent senior leadership than spend a year hiring it. You want one accountable partner across strategy, build, and team enablement. Three-month minimum.
06 / Questions
A fractional Chief AI Officer owns AI strategy and delivery inside your business on a monthly retainer, without taking a full-time salary or a seat on payroll. The role covers four jobs: diagnosing where AI fits in your operation, building the roadmap, shipping the first systems, and training your team to own them. Most weeks include a leadership call, vendor evaluation work, hands-on build hours, and Slack advisory between meetings. The difference from a consultant is delivery. The difference from a full-time hire is cost and time-to-start.
A full-time Chief AI Officer or senior AI lead costs $120,000–$180,000 in salary alone, plus equity, benefits, and recruiting fees that push first-year cost well past $150,000 once you include the 4-month recruiting gap where the role sits open. The recruiting timeline averages three to four months before the right person says yes. A fractional CAIO costs a fraction of that monthly, starts within two weeks of the scoping call, and includes the build hours a single hire still cannot deliver alone. The math favors fractional until you have a 50-person AI team to manage, which is rarely true for a 5–50 person company.
You need a CAIO when you have three or more AI opportunities in the queue and nobody owning the sequence. A single workflow automation is a project. Three workflows, a content system, an internal agent, and a governance framework is a department. If you're sketching the second or third system and you don't have someone who will say "no, build that one third because the data isn't ready yet," you need a CAIO. If you have one clean project, take Workflow Automation. If you want a defined 90-day sprint with an end date, take Operations Transformation. CAIO is the ongoing relationship that picks up after either of them.
Most AI consultants deliver strategy and a deck. The build belongs to someone else, usually a separate implementation partner or your internal team. A fractional CAIO delivers strategy and ships the build. Same person, same accountability, same calendar. The strategy and the implementation are not handoffs because they're the same engagement. That single difference is why we measure value in systems shipped, not hours billed.
We build. The proof is on this page. Show Me The Bids was a six-week build under fractional advisory: two-sided marketplace, two roles, three dashboards, 17 transactional emails, 443 automated tests. The same builder ships the GBP Automation, LinkedIn Engine, and Hyperlocal SEO systems you'll see across the work pages. These were built, not recommended. If a CAIO can only advise, the engagement is a consulting retainer with a fancier name.
We take 2-3 CAIO clients at a time. No more. Before you sign, you see our current calendar and engagement load, so the capacity question is answered before it becomes one. If we're full, we say so and offer a start date. The math only works because we don't overbook ourselves into the same kind of mess we're hired to fix.
That's the design. Every engagement names an internal counterpart on your side and trains them on every system we build. By month six they can run the playbook. If you outgrow us, you take the documented systems, the governance framework, and the runbooks, and you keep going. We've structured handoffs for clients who moved AI ownership in-house after the first year. The point is to be useful, not to be necessary forever.
Next step
We'll cover your current operation, where you'd want a CAIO to start, and which tier fits. Proposal within 48 hours of the call. If the assessment makes more sense first, we'll tell you.